[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#278928: marked as done (xfonts-base: glyphs for codepoints U+2198 (SOUTH EAST ARROW) and U+2199 (SOUTH WEST ARROW) are swapped)



Your message dated Fri, 1 Jan 2010 14:13:29 +0000
with message-id <20100101141329.GA23492@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#278928: xfonts-75dpi: swapped mixed-fixed arrow glyphs
has caused the Debian Bug report #278928,
regarding xfonts-base: glyphs for codepoints U+2198 (SOUTH EAST ARROW) and U+2199 (SOUTH WEST ARROW) are swapped
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
278928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=278928
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xfonts-75dpi
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
Severity: normal

At least in -Misc-Fixed-Medium-R-Normal--13-120-75-75-C-70-ISO10646-1,
the glyphs for U+2198 (SOUTH EAST ARROW) and U+2199 (SOUTH WEST ARROW)
are swapped.  I haven't check the rest of misc-fixed.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages xfonts-75dpi depends on:
ii  xutils                    4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System utility programs

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.0.1

On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 13:52:19 +0100, Dave Love wrote:

> At least in -Misc-Fixed-Medium-R-Normal--13-120-75-75-C-70-ISO10646-1,
> the glyphs for U+2198 (SOUTH EAST ARROW) and U+2199 (SOUTH WEST ARROW)
> are swapped.  I haven't check the rest of misc-fixed.
> 
This was fixed upstream in font-misc-misc 1.1.0, and included in the
just uploaded xfonts-base 1:1.0.1.  Thanks for your report.

Cheers,
Julien


--- End Message ---

Reply to: