Bug#560648: FTBFS: B-D on xtrans-dev is set unappropriately
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 12:02:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 21:48:12 +0200, Eric Pozharski wrote:
> > What surprises me most, is that above mentioned build log (at line
> > 248) shows installation of xtrans-dev_1.2.5-1 and then build fails.
> > Although, I've just built successfully libx11_2:1.3.3-4 against the
> > very same xtrans-dev.
> >
> > But, anyway, xtrans-dev_1.2.5-1 isn't enough. Please provide
> > relation
Typo. plz read xtrnas-dev_1.2.3-3
> > for Build-Depends on xtrans-dev of libx11 (my reading of the
> > changelog of xtrans could be wrong, thus I can't pick appropriate
> > version; while you, X Strike Force guys, are more qualified to
> > choose. Thank you for your colaboration.
> >
> If you think the build-depends are wrong, please file a new bug with a
> new failed build log (with minor severity). This one is fixed.
Let me put it in different words and consequently.
* In order to build libx11 Build-Depends xtrans-dev (whatever)
* There is/was a problem with showing in6addr_any in
libx11-6.symbols
* That problem was fixed by xtrans-dev at some point (I can't
say what, that's unclear from Debian.changelog and I dare not
to dig through git for that piece of info (I don't know C that
much))
* libx11 still Build-Depends on whatever xtrans-dev
I was told that if Build-Depends and company are satisfied (and they
were satisfied otherwise build wouldn't have started at all) then the
package must build. If the package doesn't then it's FTBFS and serious.
However, as you wish.
--
Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination
Stallman's goal for GNU is even simpler: Freedom
Reply to: