On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 18:25:32 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > tags 600405 + fixed-upstream > thanks > > On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 at 13:51:56 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > It turns out this can be worked around by reverting part of the "+shadow" > > series. On the upstream bug, Chris Wilson thinks the correct fix is to improve > > backlight setting in the kernel, though. > > There is now a different upstream fix for this in master > (commit 33c08882c0d from Keith Packard) which also works for me. I don't know > whether you'd prefer to use that one, or the reversion I suggested. > > http://git.debian.org/?p=users/smcv/xserver-xorg-video-intel.git > (the upstream fix applied as a patch instead) certainly works with my current > kernel, which is 2.6.32-27 for amd64. > I'd committed the revert on monday: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-intel.git;a=commitdiff;h=2e37d6f4183f695386ded784720870a9598d3825 I don't know of a bug number the initial patch was fixing, so I'd go with the revert instead of the cherry-pick. We were waiting for 2.13.0 to move to testing (which has now happened), I guess we'll upload soonish. The next upload will also probably disable shadow on 865G (which is apparently less broken than 845 and 855), and have some version of http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/commit/?id=455f2939a661764ebb8d1747d44e16a0a8937808 (I had a simpler patch to do this which just called pci_device_has_kernel_driver() from intel_pci_probe(); since we're autoloading i915 from udev we don't need to modprobe it from X.) Let me know if you'd like to work on getting that ready so I can cross it out of my todo list ;) Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature