Your message dated Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:55:09 +0100 with message-id <20101108235509.GB9449@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602864: libxaw7 rather than libxaw7-dev contain libXaw.so has caused the Debian Bug report #602864, regarding libxaw7 rather than libxaw7-dev contain libXaw.so to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 602864: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602864 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: libxaw7 rather than libxaw7-dev contain libXaw.so
- From: "Matthew W. S. Bell" <matthew@bells23.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:47:56 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1289256476.3724.9.camel@ibis.bells>
Package: libXaw7 Version: 2:1.0.8-1 Bare .so symlinks should go in the development package (says Policy ch. 8), and also libxaw7 would need conflicts/replaces to prevent it stepping on earlier versions of libxaw7-dev. Matthew W.S. BellAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "Matthew W. S. Bell" <matthew@bells23.org.uk>, 602864-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#602864: libxaw7 rather than libxaw7-dev contain libXaw.so
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:55:09 +0100
- Message-id: <20101108235509.GB9449@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1289256476.3724.9.camel@ibis.bells>
- References: <[🔎] 1289256476.3724.9.camel@ibis.bells>
Version: 2:1.0.8-2 Matthew W. S. Bell <matthew@bells23.org.uk> (08/11/2010): > Package: libXaw7 > Version: 2:1.0.8-1 > > Bare .so symlinks should go in the development package (says Policy > ch. 8), and also libxaw7 would need conflicts/replaces to prevent > it stepping on earlier versions of libxaw7-dev. Known, and fixed already. Accepted: | Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:47:18 +0000 Mraw, KiBi.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---