Bug#600490: is there any chance this is backported to squeeze?

To: 600490@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#600490: is there any chance this is backported to squeeze?
From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:21:16 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20101022132116.GX5227@const.bordeaux.inria.fr>
Reply-to: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>, 600490@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] AANLkTim8bJVTsoZDGgX5R53AwTOCADpPv52MwNkq9gw_@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] AANLkTim8bJVTsoZDGgX5R53AwTOCADpPv52MwNkq9gw_@mail.gmail.com>

squeeze is not released yet, so it's not even a backport, it'll just
follow the usual fix migration during the freeze.

Samuel

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#600490: is there any chance this is backported to squeeze?
  - From: Dima Pasechnik <dimpase@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#600490: is there any chance this is backported to squeeze?
Next by Date: Processed: severity of 536612 is normal
Previous by thread: Bug#600490: is there any chance this is backported to squeeze?
Next by thread: Processed: severity of 536612 is normal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread