[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#362062: marked as done (Should provide a xorg-dbg metapackage)

Your message dated Wed, 9 Jun 2010 23:01:27 +0200
with message-id <20100609210127.GH3043@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#362062: Should provide a xorg-dbg metapackage
has caused the Debian Bug report #362062,
regarding Should provide a xorg-dbg metapackage
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
362062: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=362062
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.0.10
Severity: wishlist

In addition to the xorg and xorg-dev metapackages, the xorg source
package should provide a xorg-dbg metapackage to depend on all the
lib*-dbg packges.

- Josh Triplett

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Apr  5, 2010 at 11:27:23 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 11:08:12PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org> (11/04/2006):
> > > In addition to the xorg and xorg-dev metapackages, the xorg source
> > > package should provide a xorg-dbg metapackage to depend on all the
> > > lib*-dbg packges.
> > 
> > Not sure we want to do so. Could be quite a mess and not really
> > maintainable. I've been thinking about a possible script we could
> > ship, and tell people to use in order to determine which *-dbg
> > packages they might want to install to get meaningful backtraces, by
> > detecting the current set of packages. Might be more helpful?
> 
> At this point, I agree that it no longer makes sense to have an xorg-dbg
> metapackage.  One of the planned solutions for universal handling of
> debug packages will probably handle this.  Feel free to close this bug.
> 
Let's do that then.  Thanks.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: