On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 22:33:27 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-05-14 22:16 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 21:16:03 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > > >> You will get interesting segfaults in xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (and > >> other rdepends of libdrm-nouveau1, if there are any) after this ABI > >> break without soname bump. Anyone who has a bright idea what to do > >> about that problem? > >> > > Two solutions, afaict: > > Breaks: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (<< some-version) > > or changing the package name to libdrm-nouveau1with2.6.34abi (well, ok, > > not that one, but you get the idea). > > I had tried something like this and failed because libtool does not > accept non-numeric versions. > I meant changing the package name without changing the actual soname. > > There probably aren't any other rdepends at this point since we don't > > build the 3d driver yet, so Breaks seems easiest. > > Yes, we can probably get away with that. Would also be good to bump the > version of all symbols in libdrm-nouveau1.symbols to ensure that > packages built against the new libdrm are not accidentally used with an > older version of libdrm-nouveau1. > Yes, if the package isn't renamed then that will be necessary. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature