[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#581647: xterm: README.Debian refers to non-existent x11-common/FAQ file



Package: xterm
Version: 258-1
Severity: minor

The /usr/share/doc/xterm/README.Debian file contains this:

  Newcomers to the X Window System should first read the Debian X FAQ
  (Frequently Asked Questions list): /usr/share/doc/x11-common/FAQ.gz.
  You can view this file with your favorite pager program after decompressing
  it.  For example:
      $ zcat /usr/share/doc/x11-common/FAQ.gz | pager

However that file does not exist:

  $ ls -log /usr/share/doc/x11-common/
  total 240
  -rw-r--r-- 1    801 Jan  6 09:41 NEWS.Debian.gz
  -rw-r--r-- 1    184 Sep 29  2009 TODO
  -rw-r--r-- 1 194817 Jan 15  2009 changelog.Debian.old.gz
  -rw-r--r-- 1  28870 May  7 05:34 changelog.gz
  -rw-r--r-- 1   3232 Jan 15  2009 copyright

  Package: x11-common
  Version: 1:7.5+6

Thanks,
Bob

Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii  libc6                     2.10.2-8       Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libfontconfig1            2.8.0-2.1      generic font configuration library
ii  libice6                   2:1.0.6-1      X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5               5.7+20100313-2 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libutempter0              1.1.5-3        A privileged helper for utmp/wtmp 
ii  libx11-6                  2:1.3.3-3      X11 client-side library
ii  libxaw7                   2:1.0.7-1      X11 Athena Widget library
ii  libxft2                   2.1.14-2       FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxmu6                   2:1.0.5-1      X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxt6                    1:1.0.7-1      X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  xbitmaps                  1.1.0-1        Base X bitmaps

Versions of packages xterm recommends:
ii  x11-utils                     7.5+3      X11 utilities
ii  xutils                        1:7.5+6    X Window System utility programs m

Versions of packages xterm suggests:
pn  xfonts-cyrillic               <none>     (no description available)



Reply to: