Your message dated Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:43:37 +0200 with message-id <20100416224337.GN12698@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#578102: compiz-core: suggests nvidia-glx (>= 1.0.9625-1) has caused the Debian Bug report #578102, regarding compiz-core: suggests nvidia-glx (>= 1.0.9625-1) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 578102: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578102 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: bugs@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: compiz-core: suggests nvidia-glx (>= 1.0.9625-1)
- From: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn@axis.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:44:20 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1004162338590.15958@somehost>
Package: compiz-core Version: 0.8.4-3 Severity: minor I see that suggestion when I upgrade compiz-core. I already have nvidia-glx 190.53-4 (installed and on hold), so suggesting nvidia-glx is not really useful. This may very well be a package management tool shortage, but I can't be sure. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages compiz-core depends on: ii libc6 2.10.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 7.7.1-1 A free implementation of the OpenG ii libice6 2:1.0.6-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm6 2:1.1.1-1 X11 Session Management library ii libstartup-notification0 0.10-1 library for program launch feedbac ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-3 X11 client-side library ii libxcomposite1 1:0.4.1-1 X11 Composite extension library ii libxcursor1 1:1.1.10-2 X cursor management library ii libxdamage1 1:1.1.2-1 X11 damaged region extension libra ii libxext6 2:1.1.1-3 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxfixes3 1:4.0.4-2 X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio ii libxinerama1 2:1.1-3 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxml2 2.7.7.dfsg-2 GNOME XML library ii libxrandr2 2:1.3.0-3 X11 RandR extension library ii libxslt1.1 1.1.26-3 XSLT processing library - runtime ii mesa-utils 7.7.1-1 Miscellaneous Mesa GL utilities Versions of packages compiz-core recommends: ii compiz-plugins 0.8.4-3 OpenGL window and compositing mana Versions of packages compiz-core suggests: hi nvidia-glx 190.53-4 NVIDIA binary Xorg driver -- no debconf information Cheers, -- Cristian
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn@axis.com>, 578102-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#578102: compiz-core: suggests nvidia-glx (>= 1.0.9625-1)
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:43:37 +0200
- Message-id: <20100416224337.GN12698@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1004162338590.15958@somehost>
- References: <[🔎] 1004162338590.15958@somehost>
Hi Cristian, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn@axis.com> (16/04/2010): > I see that suggestion when I upgrade compiz-core. > > I already have nvidia-glx 190.53-4 (installed and on hold), so > suggesting nvidia-glx is not really useful. This may very well be a > package management tool shortage, but I can't be sure. what else could it be? The package advertises package relationships, which are independent from what's currently installed on your system. If your package manager is pointing out packages in Suggests that are already installed, that's indeed probably a bug (or a feature, I don't know) in your package manager. Since you didn't tell us which one it is, I can't reassign this bugreport there; I'm closing this bugreport instead, and letting you open one against your package manager, so that it includes proper information for the maintainer of that package manager. Mraw, KiBi.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---