[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#574396: xterm: meta no longer sends escape even with eightBitInput: false



Package: xterm
Version: 256-1
Severity: normal

My X resources set XTerm*eightBitInput: false, because (as noted in
#326200 and #534192) that's generally a saner choice nowadays.
However, a recent upgrade (presumably to xterm itself) broke that;
alt-key combinations now yield non-ASCII characters rather than the
expected escape sequences, which I have to remind myself to type
explicitly. :-/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii  libc6                     2.10.2-6       Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libfontconfig1            2.8.0-2        generic font configuration library
ii  libice6                   2:1.0.6-1      X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5               5.7+20100313-1 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libutempter0              1.1.5-2        A privileged helper for utmp/wtmp 
ii  libx11-6                  2:1.3.3-2      X11 client-side library
ii  libxaw7                   2:1.0.7-1      X11 Athena Widget library
ii  libxft2                   2.1.14-2       FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxmu6                   2:1.0.5-1      X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxt6                    1:1.0.7-1      X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  xbitmaps                  1.1.0-1        Base X bitmaps

Versions of packages xterm recommends:
ii  x11-utils                     7.5+3      X11 utilities
ii  xutils                        1:7.5+5    X Window System utility programs m

Versions of packages xterm suggests:
ii  xfonts-cyrillic               1:1.0.1    Cyrillic fonts for X

-- no debconf information



Reply to: