[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#476282: marked as done (upgrade from old compiz versions may lead to missing decorations)



Your message dated Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:17:14 +0100
with message-id <20100307111714.GA5227@loulous.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#476282: no decoration (in any window)
has caused the Debian Bug report #476282,
regarding upgrade from old compiz versions may lead to missing decorations
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
476282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476282
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: compiz-gtk
Version: 0.6.3~git20080115.0ea58487-1
Severity: important

Maybe related to #457649.

When I launch compiz:

rmh@bombadil:~$ compiz --replace &
[1] 5490
rmh@bombadil:~$ Checking for Xgl: not present.
xset q doesn't reveal the location of the log file. Using fallback /var/log/Xorg.0.log
Detected PCI ID for VGA: 00:02.0 0300: 8086:27a2 (rev 03) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Checking for texture_from_pixmap: not present.
Trying again with indirect rendering:
Checking for texture_from_pixmap: present.
Checking for non power of two support: present.
Checking for Composite extension: present.
Comparing resolution (1280x800) to maximum 3D texture size (2048): Passed.
Checking for nVidia: not present.
Checking for FBConfig: present.
Checking for Xgl: not present.
Starting gtk-window-decorator

window decorations (in any window) are not visible.

Used to work fine on the same hardware back when it was running etch
(with compiz 0.5.2-2~bpo40+1 from backports.org).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_AD.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages compiz-gtk depends on:
ii  compiz-core 0.6.3~git20080115.0ea58487-1 OpenGL window and compositing mana
ii  gconf2      2.22.0-1                     GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libatk1.0-0 1.20.0-1                     The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6       2.7-10                       GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2   1.4.14-1                     The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libdbus-1-3 1.1.20-1                     simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libdbus-gli 0.74-1                       simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libdecorati 0.6.3~git20080115.0ea58487-1 Compiz window decoration library
ii  libgconf2-4 2.22.0-1                     GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglib2.0- 2.16.1-2                     The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.12.9-2                     The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libmetacity 1:2.22.0-1                   library of lightweight GTK2 based 
ii  liborbit2   1:2.14.12-0.1                libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0 1.20.0-1                     Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libstartup- 0.9-1                        library for program launch feedbac
ii  libwnck22   2.22.0-1                     Window Navigator Construction Kit 
ii  libx11-6    2:1.0.3-7                    X11 client-side library
ii  libxrender1 1:0.9.4-1                    X Rendering Extension client libra

compiz-gtk recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Upgrade from old versions don't matter anymore today, and compiz
from current unstable (0.8.4) successfully enables the basic plugins
so that you get decorations, so let's close this.

Brice


--- End Message ---

Reply to: