[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#571273: marked as done (xorg: No 3d acceleration because "Failed to open DRM device")



Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:29:15 +0100
with message-id <4B8642EB.7050108@ens-lyon.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#571273: SOLVED
has caused the Debian Bug report #571273,
regarding xorg: No 3d acceleration because "Failed to open DRM device"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
571273: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571273
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.5+3
Severity: normal


My system has become as slow as molasses after a recent upgrade.

It appears to be because it has fallen back on to software rendering:

$ glxinfo | grep render
direct rendering: Yes
OpenGL renderer string: Software Rasterizer

And in turn this appears to be some problem with dri/drm (I'm out of my depth here).

$ cat Xorg.0.log | grep drm
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0    
drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci:0000:00:02.0
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0          
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1             
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card1          
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1             
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card2          
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1             
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card3
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card4
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card5
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card6
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card7
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card8
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card9
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card10
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card11
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card12
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card13
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card14
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card15
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card1
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card2
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card3
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card4
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card5
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card6
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card7
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card8
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card9
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card10
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card11
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card12
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card13
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card14
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card15
(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or directory
(WW) intel(0): DRI2: failed to open drm device
(WW) intel(0): drmSetMaster failed: Bad file descriptor

(I'll append the full log below).

The problem arises with the xorg.conf that I'll also append below or with none.

I can't test a newer stock kernel (2.6.32) because I get a blank screen
when X tries to start (should post another bug report).

Any guidance for debugging this or working around it appreciated.

Best regards,

Boris


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages xorg depends on:
ii  gnome-terminal [x-terminal-em 2.28.2-1   The GNOME terminal emulator applic
ii  konsole [x-terminal-emulator] 4:4.3.4-1  X terminal emulator for KDE 4
ii  libgl1-mesa-dri               7.6.1-1    A free implementation of the OpenG
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]      7.6.1-1    A free implementation of the OpenG
ii  libglu1-mesa                  7.6.1-1    The OpenGL utility library (GLU)
ii  x11-apps                      7.5+2      X applications
ii  x11-session-utils             7.5+1      X session utilities
ii  x11-utils                     7.5+2      X11 utilities
ii  x11-xfs-utils                 7.4+1      X font server utilities
ii  x11-xkb-utils                 7.5+1      X11 XKB utilities
ii  x11-xserver-utils             7.5+1      X server utilities
ii  xauth                         1:1.0.4-1  X authentication utility
ii  xfonts-100dpi                 1:1.0.1    100 dpi fonts for X
ii  xfonts-75dpi                  1:1.0.1    75 dpi fonts for X
ii  xfonts-base                   1:1.0.1    standard fonts for X
ii  xfonts-scalable               1:1.0.1-1  scalable fonts for X
ii  xfonts-utils                  1:7.5+2    X Window System font utility progr
ii  xinit                         1.2.0-1    X server initialisation tool
ii  xkb-data                      1.7-2      X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  xorg-docs-core                1:1.5-1    Core documentation for the X.org X
ii  xserver-xorg                  1:7.5+3    the X.Org X server
ii  xterm [x-terminal-emulator]   253-1      X terminal emulator

xorg recommends no packages.

Versions of packages xorg suggests:
pn  xorg-docs                     <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Boris Barbour wrote:
> I confused the two bugs (#571273 and #571289) in reporting success. 
>
> In any case, with the linux-image-2.6.32-2-amd64 kernel X now starts 
> successfully AND 3d acceleration works.
>   

So I can close this one too, if I understand correctly.

Brice



--- End Message ---

Reply to: