[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#564283: libgl1-mesa-dri (7.7~rc2-1) depends on non existant package libdrm-radeon1 on i386



Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
Version: 7.7~rc2-1
Severity: normal


I'm having some problems with the r600 driver and Xorg which I believe would be fixed by using mesa 7.7  however the 7.7 experimental package depends on a libdrm-intel1  which doesn't exist anywhere. (Interestingly if I'm reading things right it's only i386 that requires it.)

apt-get install -t experimental libgl1-mesa-dri
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libgl1-mesa-dri: Depends: libdrm-radeon1 (>= 2.4.13) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages

I'd imagine things would be a lower priority since this is an experimental package but it would be awesome if things could be sorted so us i386 users could try out mesa 7.7



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libgl1-mesa-dri depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.10.2-4   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libdrm-intel1                 2.4.15-1   Userspace interface to intel-speci
ii  libdrm2                       2.4.15-1   Userspace interface to kernel DRM 
ii  libexpat1                     2.0.1-7    XML parsing C library - runtime li

libgl1-mesa-dri recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libgl1-mesa-dri suggests:
pn  libglide3                     <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information



Reply to: