Bug#539705: can we proceed?
2009/9/12 Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 13:18:16 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:50:57 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> >
>> >> Unless I'm mistaken, all the required components for this new MESA and
>> >> the new X.org to go into Testing are ready. Shall we remove this
>> >> artificial RC bug then?
>> >>
>> > Not unless we want to ignore xserver-xorg-video-intel bugginess.
>> > I'm not sure that we do, at this point.
>>
>> If -intel is the problem, then why don't we block that one, instead of
>> blocking the whole X transition by blocking mesa?
>>
> Is this a joke?
Intel has all the paid developers in the world to look after that
particular issue with their driver. Meanwhile, the rest of X works
fine as it is.
Reply to: