Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > The latter choice would be too complicated if the font package ships more > than one alias file. So, I take the former. > > debhelper patch looks cleaner, and I hope the added options are OK for > xfonts-utils. This patch is fine by me for debhelper; of course I need to wait until xfonts-utils is uploaded before I can apply it. (Also the misc:Depends will need to be versioned to ensure the new xfonts-utils version is depended on.) So let me know when xfonts-utils gets these options. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature