Bug#545114: marked as done (x11-xserver-utils: xrandr undefined symbol: XRRGetScreenSizeRange)
Your message dated Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:58:55 +0200
with message-id <4AA26E9F.3050700@ens-lyon.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#545114: x11-xserver-utils: xrandr undefined symbol: XRRGetScreenSizeRange
has caused the Debian Bug report #545114,
regarding x11-xserver-utils: xrandr undefined symbol: XRRGetScreenSizeRange
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
545114: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545114
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: x11-xserver-utils
Version: 7.3+5
Severity: important
After upgrading to lenny, xrandr does not work on my Thinkpad X40. It reports
xrandr: symbol lookup error: xrandr: undefined symbol: XRRGetScreenSizeRange
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21.5 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages x11-xserver-utils depends on:
ii cpp 4:4.3.2-2 The GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libsm6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 Session Management library
ii libx11-6 2:1.1.5-2 X11 client-side library
ii libxau6 1:1.0.3-3 X11 authorisation library
ii libxaw7 2:1.0.4-2 X11 Athena Widget library
ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii libxi6 2:1.1.4-1 X11 Input extension library
ii libxmu6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii libxmuu1 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous micro-utility li
ii libxrandr2 2:1.2.3-1 X11 RandR extension library
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.4-2 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii libxt6 1:1.0.5-3 X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii libxtrap6 2:1.0.0-5 X11 event trapping extension libra
ii libxxf86misc1 1:1.0.1-3 X11 XFree86 miscellaneous extensio
ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.0.2-1 X11 XFree86 video mode extension l
ii x11-common 1:7.3+19 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc
x11-xserver-utils recommends no packages.
x11-xserver-utils suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Jim Cline wrote:
> Hi Brice,
>
> Thanks, you've correctly guessed the problem! Long ago when I first
> installed sarge, I was experimenting with Xorg, and I installed it at
> /opt/Xorg-6.7.99.1/, but then I decided to go back to X11. I had
> forgotten about that until seeing it show up here:
>
> root@shiva:/home/jcline# ldd /usr/bin/xrandr
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
> libXrandr.so.2 => /opt/Xorg-6.7.99.1/lib/libXrandr.so.2
> (0xb7f45000)
> libXrender.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0xb7f3d000)
> libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb7e75000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7d37000)
> libXext.so.6 => /opt/Xorg-6.7.99.1/lib/libXext.so.6 (0xb7d29000)
> libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb7d25000)
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f68000)
>
> (and of course
> root@shiva:/home/jcline# objdump -T /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 | grep
> XRRGetScreenSize
> 00004780 g DF .text 00000144 Base XRRGetScreenSizeRange)
>
> So obviously there's nothing wrong with the debian package and you can
> close the bug. Sorry to have bothered you with that. Any advice on
> how to correct the problem? I'm not very knowledgable about library
> configuration.
ld.so doesn't look in /opt/Xorg-6.7.99.1.1/lib by default, so you
probably added this path manually. See if you can remove it
/etc/ld.so.conf*. Or maybe in LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your shell config.
Removing /opt/Xorg-6.7.99.1 will also work, but it won't prevent ld.so
from looking there anyway.
Closing the bug.
Brice
--- End Message ---
Reply to: