[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#541089: marked as done (xterm: bold color attribute now displaying as black by default)



Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:53:46 +0200
with message-id <20090811175346.GO23999@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#541089: xterm: bold color attribute now displaying as black by default
has caused the Debian Bug report #541089,
regarding xterm: bold color attribute now displaying as black by default
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
541089: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541089
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xterm
Version: 244-1
Severity: minor

	With yesterday's update of xterm, bold  attributes are
displaying in the color black.  I'm assuming '+bdc' got set by default
somehow instead of '-bdc'?

	Anyway, since a lot of people probably use black as their
default background color, this might cause a lot of problems.  Not only
did portions of my prompt string disappear in my shell (minor issue),
but man pages are pretty much unreadable.

	Simply setting the resource (or passing the '-bdc' option to my
xterm) fixes the problem.  I'm not sure if this is something you need to
address, but I'm submitting this report for reference sake at the very
least.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii  libc6                     2.9-24         GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libfontconfig1            2.6.0-4        generic font configuration library
ii  libice6                   2:1.0.5-1      X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5               5.7+20090803-1 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libx11-6                  2:1.2.2-1      X11 client-side library
ii  libxaw7                   2:1.0.6-1      X11 Athena Widget library
ii  libxft2                   2.1.13-3       FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxmu6                   2:1.0.4-2      X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxt6                    1:1.0.5-3      X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  xbitmaps                  1.0.1-2        Base X bitmaps

Versions of packages xterm recommends:
ii  x11-utils                     7.4+1      X11 utilities
ii  xutils                        1:7.4+3    X Window System utility programs m

Versions of packages xterm suggests:
pn  xfonts-cyrillic               <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:41:18 -0500, Mark Nipper wrote:

> On 11 Aug 2009, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I can't reproduce this.  manpages are readable for me with the default
> > settings, and xterm +bdc makes bold text disappear.
> > Anything particular in your setup?
> 
> 	You may not have gotten my update to that bug report.  I

Right, I got it just after replying to the initial report :)

> think you inadvertently fixed something with this most recent
> release.  The fact that colorBDMode was enabled was actually my
> own fault (I had it in my .Xresources).  But I've had it in my
> .Xresources for years now, and this only just now became an
> issue.
> 
> 	So disabling colorBDMode fixed my problem.  And regarding
> this issue, xterm is actually working as documented now (which
> apparently it wasn't before).  So thanks!  :)
> 
Closing the bug per submitter, thanks!

Cheers,
Julien


--- End Message ---

Reply to: