[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#521253: libdrm: libdrm-dev uninstallable on GNU/kFreeBSD (depends on linux specific package)



On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 14:59 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> We already have some in /usr/include/dev/drm/
> i.e. on kfreebsd-amd64:  ls -l /usr/include/dev/drm
> total 584
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  22090 Jan  6 12:02 drm.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  32947 Jan  6 12:02 drmP.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   3968 Jan  6 12:02 drm_atomic.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2468 Jan  6 12:02 drm_linux_list.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  26061 Jan  6 12:02 drm_pciids.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2666 Jan  6 12:02 drm_sarea.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   8408 Jan  6 12:02 i915_drm.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   9047 Jan  6 12:02 i915_drv.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   8005 Jan  6 12:02 mach64_drm.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  35804 Jan  6 12:02 mach64_drv.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  13061 Jan  6 12:02 mga_drm.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  19748 Jan  6 12:02 mga_drv.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 181469 Jan  6 12:02 mga_ucode.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  10527 Jan  6 12:02 r128_drm.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  16489 Jan  6 12:02 r128_drv.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  69976 Jan  6 12:02 r300_reg.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  26625 Jan  6 12:02 radeon_drm.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  41421 Jan  6 12:02 radeon_drv.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   7182 Jan  6 12:02 savage_drm.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  19696 Jan  6 12:02 savage_drv.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2653 Jan  6 12:02 sis_drm.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   2061 Jan  6 12:02 sis_drv.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   4714 Jan  6 12:02 sis_ds.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   1820 Jan  6 12:02 tdfx_drv.h
> 
> Would be this sufficient or should we add symlink "drm -> dev/drm"
> in /usr/include/ ?

Making /usr/include/drm a symlink won't work as libdrm-dev still
installs xgi_drm.h, via_3d_reg.h, mach64_drm.h, nouveau_drm.h and
r300_reg.h there.  You could make symlinks for individual files though.

Beware that the versions you have might be too old for current intel
mesa and 2d drivers (what I'm seeing on io.debian.net definitely is).

Cheers,
Julien



Reply to: