Bug#557577: marked as done (Why so many repeated lines in Xorg.0.log?)
Your message dated Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:41:38 +0100
with message-id <20091123084138.GD3903@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#557577: Why so many repeated lines in Xorg.0.log?
has caused the Debian Bug report #557577,
regarding Why so many repeated lines in Xorg.0.log?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
557577: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557577
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.5~1
Severity: wishlist
Why so many repeated lines in Xorg.0.log?
$ sort Xorg.0.log|uniq -c|sort -nr
14 (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1152x864" (exceeds panel dimensions)
10 (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "800x600" (exceeds panel dimensions)
10 (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1600x1200" (exceeds panel dimensions)
8 (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1680x1050" (exceeds panel dimensions)
8 (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1400x1050" (exceeds panel dimensions)
8 (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1024x768" (exceeds panel dimensions)
7 (**) Option "xkb_rules" "evdev"
7 (**) Option "xkb_model" "pc104"
7 (**) Option "xkb_layout" "us"
6 (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "2048x1536" (exceeds panel dimensions)
6 (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1920x1440" (exceeds panel dimensions)
Tell me if you want the whole thing.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:18:00 +0800, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.5~1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Why so many repeated lines in Xorg.0.log?
>
Because.
Cheers,
Julien
--- End Message ---
Reply to: