Bug#548716: Why not fixed for amd64?
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 01:08 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 00:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 00:00:24 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > > Why is the patched 1.6.4-2 not built for amd64, only i386 and s390?
> > >
> > If you're asking this question, you shouldn't be using debian unstable.
>
> Sorry for raising this question, but I thought the patched package was
> built automatically by the buildds. Is this a manual thing? Then I
> really apologize. I just tried to point out that the problems were not
> only affecting i386 users. This was also reflected by some of the many
> bug reports. However, since the bug was solved for i386 (and s390)
> users it will be removed. The problem still remains for other architectures.
> Is there no way to tell for which architectures the bugs are reported to.
> I did not find any bug report tags or pseudoheaders for this! I beg to
> continue to use Debian unstable, you are doing a very good job!
Taking a closer look at the bug report 548716 from Pancho Horrillo shows
that he has an amd64 box, so this bug should not be closed until 1.6.4-2
is available for that architecture.
Reply to: