[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#546471: marked as done (xserver-xorg-core 1.6.3-1+b1 dep. unavailable xserver-common (>> 7))



Your message dated Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:52:24 +0200
with message-id <20090913125224.GL9382@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#546471: xserver-xorg-core 1.6.3-1+b1 dep. unavailable xserver-common (>> 7)
has caused the Debian Bug report #546471,
regarding xserver-xorg-core 1.6.3-1+b1 dep. unavailable xserver-common (>> 7)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
546471: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546471
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.6.3-1+b1
Severity: important


Hello,

xserver-xorg-core 2:1.6.3-1+b1 :
---------------
Depends: xserver-common (>> 7), ...
....
---------------
It dows not fit, because in sid is xserver-common 2:1.6.3-1.

Thanks
christian



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 14:12:49 +0200, nutzteil wrote:

> Package: xserver-xorg-core
> Version: 2:1.6.3-1+b1
> Severity: important
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> xserver-xorg-core 2:1.6.3-1+b1 :
> ---------------
> Depends: xserver-common (>> 7), ...
> ....
> ---------------
> It dows not fit, because in sid is xserver-common 2:1.6.3-1.
> 
It does fit, 2:1.6.3-1 is greater than 7.

Cheers,
Julien


--- End Message ---

Reply to: