Bug#541716: xterm: colorBDMode is dead
Package: xterm
Version: 244-2
Severity: normal
My bash prompt is set to "%B(%?)%#%b ", which should print some stuff
in bold. Man pages, mutt, and other packages print some stuff in
bold.
The xterm resource colorBDMode when set to true tells xterm to print
bold text in colour. But as of the last xterm update, bold text is
printed in oh-so-sexy black-on-black when colorBDMode is on.
My xterm xresources are:
xterm*VT100*colorBDMode: on
xterm*VT100*colorBD: red
xterm.VT100*colorULMode: on
xterm.VT100*underLine: off
xterm*VT100*colorUL: magenta
xterm.VT100.titeInhibit: true
xterm.VT100*dynamicColors: on
xterm*metaSendsEscape: true
xterm*highlightSelection: true
xterm*scrollBar: true
xterm*saveLines: 1500
xterm*reverseWrap: true
xterm*visualBell: true
xterm*scrollTtyOutput: False
xterm*scrollKey: True
xterm*foreground: white
xterm*background: black
xterm*cursorColor: red
xterm*locale: true
Disabling colorBDMode gives me standard bold, as it should.
Thanks!
-Ben
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii libc6 2.9-24 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libfontconfig1 2.6.0-4 generic font configuration library
ii libice6 2:1.0.5-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libncurses5 5.7+20090803-1+b1 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libx11-6 2:1.2.2-1 X11 client-side library
ii libxaw7 2:1.0.6-1 X11 Athena Widget library
ii libxft2 2.1.13-3 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii libxmu6 2:1.0.4-2 X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii libxt6 1:1.0.5-3 X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii xbitmaps 1.0.1-2 Base X bitmaps
Versions of packages xterm recommends:
ii x11-utils 7.4+1 X11 utilities
ii xutils 1:7.4+4 X Window System utility programs m
Versions of packages xterm suggests:
pn xfonts-cyrillic <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
Reply to: