[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

status of the 7.4 transition, take 2



Status update.

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 14:44:55 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> now that (almost) all drivers have been rebuilt, I'd like to get an
> overview of where we stand with regards to testing migration.  This
> means two things: dependencies on non-xorg stuff that has to migrate
> first, and blocker bugs in our packages.

> On the first point, the deps I know of are linux-2.6 and console-setup.
> The former has been recently fixed to build on all architectures, so
> should hopefully be able to migrate soon enough.  The latter needs some
> aging, but has no outstanding issues afaik.

console-setup has migrated a while ago, linux-2.6 had a new upload today
which will hopefully be able to make it to testing.

> On the second point I'm not quite sure:
> - xorg-server has one outstanding serious bug, #508476: when
>   xserver-xorg-video-fbdev is installed and you have no xorg.conf, X
>   FatalErrors for no good reason.  Should this be a blocker?  Anything
>   else?

This is fixed (well, worked around, but that's good enough).

> - xorg has #516028, #527860, #524657; I don't think any of those should
>   be blockers, what do others think.  Anything else?

516028 and 527860 are closed, 524657 downgraded and tagged moreinfo.

> - then there's the intel driver situation.  2.7.0 was pretty broken from
>   what I understand, I have no idea where things stand in 2.7.1 or
>   2.7.99.x.  There's one critical (!) bug filed against 2.7.99.1, which
>   should probably be downgraded to grave or important.  Then there's 3
>   grave bugs.  #523953 was filed against 2.6.3, then 2.7.0, has no data
>   about 2.7.1.  #525231 was filed against 2.7.0, no info about 2.7.1.
>   #526169 is a jidanni bug, but has at least one other affected user;
>   seems a bit confused to me, might actually be a kernel bug, so would
>   be nice to have updated info, with latest linux-2.6 and -intel.
>   Any others that aren't filed as RC?

2.8.0 seems better.  #525231 is still open/RC, but with no info about
2.8.0 IIRC.

> - any known major issues in other packages?
> 
There's the libXi bugs (515734, 515905, 515976, 515946), which afaict
nobody has been able to investigate yet.  Shouldn't be blockers though I
think.

Overall after linux-2.6 migrates I think we're good to go.

Cheers,
Julien


Reply to: