[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

xorg: Changes to 'debian-lenny'



 debian/changelog                |    7 +++++++
 debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in |    5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

New commits:
commit 89b8ea3587eafe48c80740a8912d390702e6b02d
Author: Maximiliano Curia <maxy@debian.org>
Date:   Wed Jul 22 16:26:29 2009 -0300

    Fix stupid bug in xserver-xorg.postinst
    
    Shell scripting fail.
    ``||'' and ``&&'' have the same precedence in shell, so we ended up with
    an empty xorg.conf after installing 1:7.3+19.
    Debian bug#535624.
    
    Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 18477f8..c44450e 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+xorg (1:7.3+20) stable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload, supervised by Julien Cristau.
+  * xserver-xorg.postinst: fix for the previous patch. Closes: #535624
+
+ -- Maximiliano Curia <maxy@debian.org>  Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:26:29 -0300
+
 xorg (1:7.3+19) stable; urgency=low
 
   * xserver-xorg.postinst: default to the fbdev driver on sparc, even when we
diff --git a/debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in b/debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in
index 5beb891..8aef64a 100644
--- a/debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in
+++ b/debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in
@@ -932,7 +932,10 @@ fi
 # Don't touch the config on upgrades except to deal with known issues with old
 # configs.
 if [ -z "$UPGRADE" ] || dpkg --compare-versions "$2" le "1:7.0.14" || \
-  [ "$ARCHITECTURE" = sparc ] && dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt-nl 1:7.3+19; then
+  { [ "$ARCHITECTURE" = sparc ] && \
+      dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt-nl 1:7.3+19; } || \
+  { [ -n "$(find "$XORGCONFIG" -maxdepth 0 -size 0 2>/dev/null)" ] &&  \
+      [ "$2" = 1:7.3+19 ]; }; then
   # compare the current and stored checksums; if they do not match, assume
   # that's the way the user wants it.  if we're reconfiguring, overwrite
   # it regardless and back it up.


Reply to: