Bug#536842: compiz-gtk: No window decorations using gtk-window-decorator
Subject: compiz-gtk: No window decorations using gtk-window-decorator
Package: compiz-gtk
Version: 0.8.2-6
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I try to use compiz with Gnome and a ATI Radeon 9800 Pro card using the Xorg radeon driver (*not* fglrx!).
OpenGL, direct rendering and all this stuff works (glxinfo reports "Direct rendering: yes", 3D games are playable at high frame rates).
I can start compiz, but I have no window decorations at all while it is running. The desktop effects are working, though.
When starting compiz I get:
--snip--
$ compiz --replace
Checking for Xgl: not present.
Detected PCI ID for VGA: 02:00.0 0300: 1002:4e48 (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Checking for texture_from_pixmap: not present.
Trying again with indirect rendering:
Checking for texture_from_pixmap: present.
Checking for non power of two support: present.
Checking for Composite extension: present.
Checking screen 1Comparing resolution (1152x864) to maximum 3D texture size (2048): Passed.
Checking for Software Rasterizer: Not present.
Checking for nVidia: not present.
Checking for FBConfig: present.
Checking for Xgl: not present.
inotify_add_watch: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/compiz.real (video) - Warn: No 8 bit GLX pixmap format, disabling YV12 image format
/usr/bin/compiz.real (cube) - Warn: Failed to load slide: /usr/share/gdm/themes/Human/ubuntu.png
(gtk-window-decorator:17172): Gdk-WARNING **: Using Cairo rendering requires the drawable argument to
have a specified colormap. All windows have a colormap,
however, pixmaps only have colormap by default if they
were created with a non-NULL window argument. Otherwise
a colormap must be set on them with gdk_drawable_set_colormap
(gtk-window-decorator:17172): Gdk-WARNING **: Using Cairo rendering requires the drawable argument to
have a specified colormap. All windows have a colormap,
however, pixmaps only have colormap by default if they
were created with a non-NULL window argument. Otherwise
a colormap must be set on them with gdk_drawable_set_colormap
(gtk-window-decorator:17172): metacity-CRITICAL **: meta_frame_style_draw_with_style: assertion `style_gtk->colormap == gdk_drawable_get_colormap (drawable)' failed
(gtk-window-decorator:17172): metacity-CRITICAL **: meta_frame_style_draw_with_style: assertion `style_gtk->colormap == gdk_drawable_get_colormap (drawable)' failed
(gtk-window-decorator:17172): Gdk-WARNING **: Using Cairo rendering requires the drawable argument to
have a specified colormap. All windows have a colormap,
however, pixmaps only have colormap by default if they
were created with a non-NULL window argument. Otherwise
a colormap must be set on them with gdk_drawable_set_colormap
(gtk-window-decorator:17172): metacity-CRITICAL **: meta_frame_style_draw_with_style: assertion `style_gtk->colormap == gdk_drawable_get_colormap (drawable)' failed
(gtk-window-decorator:17172): metacity-CRITICAL **: meta_frame_style_draw_with_style: assertion `style_gtk->colormap == gdk_drawable_get_colormap (drawable)' failed
(gtk-window-decorator:17172): Gdk-WARNING **: Using Cairo rendering requires the drawable argument to
have a specified colormap. All windows have a colormap,
however, pixmaps only have colormap by default if they
were created with a non-NULL window argument. Otherwise
a colormap must be set on them with gdk_drawable_set_colormap
(even more copies of those message(s))
/usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Warn: No GLXFBConfig for depth 32
/usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Warn: No GLXFBConfig for depth 32
/usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Warn: No GLXFBConfig for depth 32
/usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Warn: No GLXFBConfig for depth 32
/usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Warn: No GLXFBConfig for depth 32
/usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Warn: No GLXFBConfig for depth 32
/usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Warn: No GLXFBConfig for depth 32
/usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Warn: No GLXFBConfig for depth 32
/usr/bin/compiz.real (core) - Warn: No GLXFBConfig for depth 32
---snip---
For me it looks like gtk-window-decorator is the source of the problem. I already tried different metacity themes with no luck.
This bug renders the package (and from that compiz) useless for me.
Bug #476282 suggests adding the "decoration" plugin to the compiz configuration. On my setup it seems to be present already:
$ gconftool --get /apps/compiz/general/allscreens/options/active_plugins
[gconf,decoration,png,svg,wobbly,fade,minimize,cube,rotate,zoom,scale,move,place,switcher,screenshot,resize]
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25.10
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages compiz-gtk depends on:
ii compiz-core 0.8.2-6 OpenGL window and compositing mana
ii gconf2 2.26.2-1 GNOME configuration database syste
ii libatk1.0-0 1.26.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.9-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libcairo2 1.8.6-2+b1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii libdbus-1-3 1.2.14-3 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.80-4 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii libdecoration0 0.8.2-6 Compiz window decoration library
ii libfontconfig1 2.6.0-3 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.3.9-4.1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgconf2-4 2.26.2-1 GNOME configuration database syste
ii libglib2.0-0 2.20.1-2 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.16.1-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libmetacity-private0 1:2.26.0-3 library for the Metacity window ma
ii libpango1.0-0 1.24.0-3+b1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libwnck22 2.26.1-1 Window Navigator Construction Kit
ii libx11-6 2:1.2.1-1 X11 client-side library
ii libxcursor1 1:1.1.9-1 X cursor management library
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.4-2 X Rendering Extension client libra
compiz-gtk recommends no packages.
Versions of packages compiz-gtk suggests:
ii gnome-themes 2.26.2-1 official themes for the GNOME desk
-- no debconf information
Reply to: