Bug#452896: marked as done (EXA is (apparently) slower than XAA on some 2d operations)
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:08:09 +0200
with message-id <4A33EB09.8050001@ens-lyon.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#451571: xserver-xorg-video-intel: uses lots of CPU with Compiz and (new default) EXA
has caused the Debian Bug report #451571,
regarding EXA is (apparently) slower than XAA on some 2d operations
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
451571: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=451571
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: EXA is (apparently) slower than XAA on some 2d operations
- From: Diego Escalante Urrelo <dieguito@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:34:17 +0000
- Message-id: <1196012057.30743.11.camel@milkyway>
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.2.0-1
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Using EXA (the default) makes some windows redraw slowly enough to be
annoying, XAA enhances the situation a bit, but it's still slow enough
to be annoying.
Dragging windows around makes the on-demand cpu governor jump to top cpu
speed (not top cpu _usage_).
Sadly this is highly subjective, I don't know how to prove this or offer
better info than my opinion.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686
Debian Release: lenny/sid
500 unstable http.us.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
==================================-+-=============
libc6 (>= 2.6.1-1) | 2.7-1
libdrm2 (>= 2.3.0) | 2.3.0-4
xserver-xorg-core (>= 2:1.4) | 2:1.4.1~git20071119-1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2:2.7.1-1
brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:08:08PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>> Does this still happen with latest intel driver from Lenny?
>> And from unstable or experimental where UXA replaces/improves EXA?
>>
>
> No. The driver from unstable is fine with EXA and the one from
> experimental works fine with UXA. It's fine with me if you close the
> bug.
>
Good to know, thanks. I am marking as fixed in 2.7.1 even it might have
been fixed earlier.
Let's hope that all merged bugs are gone as well.
Brice
--- End Message ---
Reply to: