[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#523844: Upgrade to xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.7.0-1 doesn't help.



Am Freitag, 17. April 2009 schrieb Brice Goglin:
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux Zweiblum 2.6.26-2-686 #1 SMP Thu Mar 26 01:08:11 UTC 2009 i686
> > GNU/Linux
> > $ egrep '_PAT(_| )' < /boot/config-2.6.26-2-686
> > # CONFIG_X86_PAT is not set

> PAT wasn't supported at all in 2.6.26.

Mh, at least the configuration option is mentioned in the kernel config, 
even though it's disabled.

> But it doesn't mean that it's the same than having PAT disabled in
> 2.6.29 since the whole ioremap implementation has been intrusively
> modified.

I'm reporting back with some delay as I struggled a bit to produce a 
custom compiled 2.6.29 kernel - I was not prepared for the initrd and 
kernel-patch changes introduced by kernel-package 12 and documentation of 
the new behaviour is still rather sparse...

I now rebuild the Debian 2.6.29 kernel source package using the same 
configuration as the official image, but I enabled PAT.

Unfortunately PAT does not seem to be the (only) culprit, I still get:

$ egrep 'tiling' < /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(EE) intel(0): Failed to set tiling on front buffer: rejected by kernel
(EE) intel(0): Failed to set tiling on back buffer: rejected by kernel
(EE) intel(0): Failed to set tiling on depth buffer: rejected by kernel

as with the original 2.6.29 image and Xorg compositing performance is 
still unusuably slow.

$ uname -a
Linux Zweiblum 2.6.29.debian.pat.20090418.1 #1 SMP Sat Apr 18 10:26:43 
CEST 2009 i686 GNU/Linux

$ egrep '_PAT(_|=| )' < /boot/config-2.6.29.debian.pat.20090418.1
CONFIG_X86_PAT=y

$ egrep PAT < /var/log/dmesg
[    0.000000] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 
0x7010600070106
[    0.004000] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 1, old 0x7040600070406, new 
0x7010600070106

Compared to the official 2.6.29 image, x11perf shows doubled performance:
1200000 trep @   0.0218 msec ( 46000.0/sec): Char in 80-char aa line 
(Charter 10)

However this is still several times slower than with the Debian kernel 
2.6.26 image and does not improve usability.

Greetings,

  Gunter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: