[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#516544: marked as done (libdrm-dev header conflicts with linux-libc-dev)



Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:55:49 +0200
with message-id <20090416055549.GA22125@loulous.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#516544: How I installed libdrm-dev on top of linux-libc-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #516544,
regarding libdrm-dev header conflicts with linux-libc-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
516544: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516544
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libdrm-dev
Version: 2.4.4+git+20090205+8b88036-1
Severity: serious
Justification: undeclared file conflict

Hey,

trying to install linux-libc-dev 2.6.28-1 along with libdrm-dev
2.4.4+git+20090205+8b88036-1 leads to dpkg complaining:

Preparing to replace linux-libc-dev 2.6.26-13 (using
.../linux-libc-dev_2.6.28-1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement linux-libc-dev ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-libc-dev_2.6.28-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/include/drm/i915_drm.h', which is also in
package libdrm-dev
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-libc-dev_2.6.28-1_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

There was an open bug against linux-libc-dev asking for a Replaces: for
previous drm versions, which is indeed present. But headers are present in
libdrm-dev built from drm-snapshot.

Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-rc5+thinkpad-00190-g5f0cd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libdrm-dev depends on:
ii  libdrm-inte 2.4.4+git+20090205+8b88036-1 Userspace interface to Intel-speci
ii  libdrm-nouv 2.4.4+git+20090205+8b88036-1 Userspace interface to Nouveau-spe
ii  libdrm2     2.4.4+git+20090205+8b88036-1 Userspace interface to kernel rend

libdrm-dev recommends no packages.

libdrm-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.4.5-2


On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 01:16:22AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:07 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > In the future, should libdrm-dev conflict with linux-libc-dev, should
> > it ship updated drm headers somewhere else, or should it replace older
> > linux-libc-dev? (What are the bad effects of updating drm headers
> > behind the back of other packages?)
> 
> libdrm-dev will probably stop shipping those headers that are installed
> by the kernel.

Done now.

Brice



--- End Message ---

Reply to: