[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#501124: marked as done (compiz: new version available)

Your message dated Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:13:35 +0200
with message-id <20090411121335.GA31021@rangda.stickybit.se>
and subject line new version uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #501124,
regarding compiz: new version available
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
501124: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=501124
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: compiz
Version: 0.7.6-7
Severity: wishlist


Hi,

could you package compiz* 0.7.8 please ?

Thanks,
	Xav

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages compiz depends on:
ii  compiz-core                   0.7.6-7    OpenGL window and compositing mana
ii  compiz-gnome                  0.7.6-7    OpenGL window and compositing mana
ii  compiz-gtk                    0.7.6-7    OpenGL window and compositing mana
ii  compiz-plugins                0.7.6-7    OpenGL window and compositing mana

compiz recommends no packages.

Versions of packages compiz suggests:
ii  compizconfig-settings-manager 0.7.6-3    Compizconfig Settings Manager

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.8.2-1

--

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: