[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#515737: xserver-xorg-input-all: After upgrading from Etch to Lenny, mouse pointer is very slow and keys don't repeat



Package: xserver-xorg-input-all
Version: 1:7.3+18
Severity: important

Hi, flagging this as important because it's an RSI issue for anyone
using X for any duration.

After upgrading from Etch to Lenny, I found 2 input problems.

1. My mouse pointer is very, very slow. I use GNOME and tried modifying 
the preferences in System / Preferences / Mouse but they seemed to have 
no effect.

After some digging, I found running 

xset m 2 2

restores the behaviour to what I think it was (fluid mouse movement 
rather than the treacly behaviour I had). Can this be the default 
behaviour? Is there a reason the GNOME settings don't apply? 

2. On a related note, I noticed that the keyboard wasn't repeating, 
particularly the arrow keys (I didn't realise how much I rely on this
behaviour until it was gone). Again, I tried modifying the GNOME 
settings but this seemed to give excessive repeating behaviour. After 
some digging, I found the following did just what I needed

xset r

Again, can this be the default?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xserver-xorg-input-all depends on:
ii  xserver-xorg-input- 1:2.0.8-1            X.Org X server -- evdev input driv
ii  xserver-xorg-input- 1:1.3.1-1            X.Org X server -- keyboard input d
ii  xserver-xorg-input- 1:1.3.0-1            X.Org X server -- mouse input driv
ii  xserver-xorg-input- 0.14.7~git20070706-3 Synaptics TouchPad driver for X.Or
ii  xserver-xorg-input- 0.7.9.3-2            X.Org X server -- Wacom input driv

xserver-xorg-input-all recommends no packages.

xserver-xorg-input-all suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: