[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#514036: xserver-xorg: screensaver doesn't start when a menu is open



Am Dienstag, den 03.02.2009, 20:31 +0100 schrieb Brice Goglin:

> > when you open a menu of e.g. KDE konqueror, GNOME nautilus or firefox
> > then the screensaver wouldn't start in my tests. First I thought its
> > a KDE bug http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176637 but the same behaviour
> > can be reproduced with gnome.
> > Or if you open a pull down menu on a website with firefox/iceweasel the
> > screensaver will not start.

> I can reproduce in Gnome with both gnome-screensaver and xscreensaver
> when opening firefox or gnome-terminal menus.
> 
> xscreensaver reported the following lines when the timeout expired:
> xscreensaver: 20:16:02: couldn't grab keyboard!  (AlreadyGrabbed)
> xscreensaver: 20:16:06: couldn't grab keyboard!  (AlreadyGrabbed)
> xscreensaver: 20:16:10: couldn't grab pointer!  (AlreadyGrabbed)
> xscreensaver: 20:16:10: unable to grab keyboard or mouse!  Blanking aborted.

The source code comment says:

xscreensaver-5.07/driver/xscreensaver.c
...
      if (! blank_screen (si))
        {
          /* We were unable to grab either the keyboard or mouse.
             This means we did not (and must not) blank the screen.
             If we were to blank the screen while some other program
             is holding both the mouse and keyboard grabbed, then
             we would never be able to un-blank it!  We would never
             see any events, and the display would be wedged.

             So, just go around the loop again and wait for the
             next bout of idleness.  (If the user remains idle, we
             will next try to blank the screen again in no more than
             60 seconds.)
          */
...

I don't know if opening a menu in an application grabs mouse and
keyboard.

-- 
Noèl Köthe <noel debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Reply to: