Your message dated Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:33:43 +0100 with message-id <20090104193343.GD17531@patate.is-a-geek.org> and subject line Re: Bug#510769: drm:i915_getparam *ERROR* Unknown parameter 5 has caused the Debian Bug report #510769, regarding drm:i915_getparam *ERROR* Unknown parameter 5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 510769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510769 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: drm:i915_getparam *ERROR* Unknown parameter 5
- From: jidanni@jidanni.org
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 03:01:48 +0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87r63i7v4z.fsf@jidanni.org>
Package: libgl1-mesa-dri Version: 7.2-1 Severity: wishlist My computer seems fine, but syslog shows: Jan 4 23:17:38 jidanni2 kernel: [ 44.819832] [drm:i915_getparam] *ERROR* Unknown parameter 5 Googling show some other non-Debian people saw similar things...
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: jidanni@jidanni.org, 510769-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#510769: drm:i915_getparam *ERROR* Unknown parameter 5
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:33:43 +0100
- Message-id: <20090104193343.GD17531@patate.is-a-geek.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87r63i7v4z.fsf@jidanni.org>
- References: <[🔎] 87r63i7v4z.fsf@jidanni.org>
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 03:01:48 +0800, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote: > Package: libgl1-mesa-dri > Version: 7.2-1 > Severity: wishlist > > My computer seems fine, but syslog shows: > Jan 4 23:17:38 jidanni2 kernel: [ 44.819832] [drm:i915_getparam] *ERROR* Unknown parameter 5 > > Googling show some other non-Debian people saw similar things... > not a bug, closing. (this is unrelated to mesa. this message is emitted if you're using xf86-video-intel >= 2.5 on a kernel < 2.6.28, because the driver is poking for GEM support; the message is harmless, and can be safely ignored) Cheers, Julien
--- End Message ---