Bug#505891: xmessage: -title option isn't documented
Package: x11-utils
Version: 7.3+2
Severity: minor
xmessage has a working -title option which isn't listed in the output of -help
nor in the manual page. It can be used to (quite obviously) change the title
of the message window.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages x11-utils depends on:
ii cpp 4:4.3.2-2 The GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
ii libc6 2.7-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libfontconfig1 2.6.0-1 generic font configuration library
ii libfontenc1 1:1.0.4-3 X11 font encoding library
ii libfreetype6 2.3.7-2 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl 7.0.3-6 A free implementation of the OpenG
ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libsm6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 Session Management library
ii libx11-6 2:1.1.5-2 X11 client-side library
ii libxaw7 2:1.0.4-2 X11 Athena Widget library
ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii libxft2 2.1.12-3 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii libxi6 2:1.1.3-1 X11 Input extension library
ii libxinerama1 2:1.0.3-2 X11 Xinerama extension library
ii libxmu6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii libxmuu1 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous micro-utility li
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.4-2 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii libxt6 1:1.0.5-3 X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii libxtst6 2:1.0.3-1 X11 Testing -- Resource extension
ii libxv1 2:1.0.4-1 X11 Video extension library
ii libxxf86dga1 2:1.0.2-1 X11 Direct Graphics Access extensi
ii libxxf86vm1 1:1.0.2-1 X11 XFree86 video mode extension l
ii x11-common 1:7.3+18 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime
x11-utils recommends no packages.
Versions of packages x11-utils suggests:
pn mesa-utils <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
Reply to: