Bug#495776: xdm: log goes to /dev/null
Package: xdm
Version: 1:1.1.8-3
Severity: important
debian/patches/xdm_fixes.diff moves the call to InitErrorLog() before
the call to BecomeDaemon(). The latter redirects standard input,
standard output and standard error to /dev/null. Hilarity ensues.
Cheers,
Julien
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages xdm depends on:
ii cpp 4:4.3.1-2 The GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.23 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.7-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libpam0g 1.0.1-2 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libselinux1 2.0.65-4 SELinux shared libraries
ii libsm6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 Session Management library
ii libx11-6 2:1.1.4-2 X11 client-side library
ii libxau6 1:1.0.3-3 X11 authorisation library
ii libxaw7 2:1.0.4-2 X11 Athena Widget library
ii libxdmcp6 1:1.0.2-3 X11 Display Manager Control Protoc
ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii libxft2 2.1.12-3 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii libxinerama1 2:1.0.3-2 X11 Xinerama extension library
ii libxmu6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii libxpm4 1:3.5.7-1 X11 pixmap library
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.4-2 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii libxt6 1:1.0.5-3 X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii lsb-base 3.2-19 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
ii x11-common 1:7.4~1 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc
ii x11-utils 7.3+2 X11 utilities
ii xbase-clients 1:7.4~1 miscellaneous X clients - metapack
xdm recommends no packages.
Versions of packages xdm suggests:
ii xutils 1:7.3+15 X Window System utility programs m
-- debconf information:
* shared/default-x-display-manager: xdm
xdm/stop_running_server_with_children: false
xdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/xdm
Reply to: