Bug#502604: FreeFontPath: FPE "/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc/:unscaled" refcount is 2, should be 1
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.3+18
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Font path /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc/:unscaled seems to automatically be added twice.
- From Xorg.log
FreeFontPath: FPE "/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc/:unscaled" refcount is 2, should be 1; fixing.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (995, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (600, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages xorg depends on:
ii eterm [x-terminal-emulator] 0.9.5-2 Enlightened Terminal Emulator
ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 7.0.3-6 A free implementation of the OpenG
ii libglu1-mesa 7.0.3-6 The OpenGL utility library (GLU)
ii x11-apps 7.3+4 X applications
ii x11-session-utils 7.3+1 X session utilities
ii x11-utils 7.3+2 X11 utilities
ii x11-xfs-utils 7.3+1 X font server utilities
ii x11-xkb-utils 7.4+1 X11 XKB utilities
ii x11-xserver-utils 7.3+5 X server utilities
ii xauth 1:1.0.3-2 X authentication utility
ii xfce4-terminal [x-terminal-em 0.2.8-5 Xfce terminal emulator
ii xfonts-100dpi 1:1.0.0-4 100 dpi fonts for X
ii xfonts-75dpi 1:1.0.0-4 75 dpi fonts for X
ii xfonts-base 1:1.0.0-5 standard fonts for X
ii xfonts-scalable 1:1.0.0-6 scalable fonts for X
ii xfonts-utils 1:7.4+1 X Window System font utility progr
ii xinit 1.0.9-2 X server initialisation tool
ii xkb-data 1.3-2 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii xserver-xorg 1:7.3+18 the X.Org X server
ii xterm [x-terminal-emulator] 237-1 X terminal emulator
Versions of packages xorg recommends:
pn xorg-docs <none> (no description available)
xorg suggests no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkj5rZAACgkQw5UvgfnzqGrtOwCgkeOultF4LZCkWsfJiyCeOFzu
3N4AoJ5RcmNzUOEndWQmoimB0ZmhgdOT
=/p68
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: