[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#493894: /usr/lib/dri/i965_dri.so: undefined symbol: _glapi_tls_Context



Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
Version: 7.1~rc3-1
Severity: normal

I was desperate today to debug #478893 a bit (reported on the bug
tracking upstream) and then decided to try experimental version present
in debian... and on 1st attempt it didn't crash -- I said whooho, but
then I checked the logs and saw:

drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is 10, (OK)
drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci:0000:00:02.0
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is 10, (OK)
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 10
drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci:0000:00:02.0
(EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/i965_dri.so failed (/usr/lib/dri/i965_dri.so: undefined symbol: _glapi_tls_Context)
(EE) AIGLX: reverting to software rendering
(II) Loading sub module "GLcore"

which might be also related to #491520 reported against libdrm2

not sure if I should jump into upgrading xserver itself (1:7.3) and or
libdrm2(2.3.1+git+20080706+401f77a-1), recommendations are welcome (or fixes in
versioned depends ;-))

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libgl1-mesa-dri depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.7-10     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdrm2                       2.3.1-1    Userspace interface to kernel DRM 
ii  libexpat1                     2.0.1-4    XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx               7.1~rc3-1  A free implementation of the OpenG

libgl1-mesa-dri recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libgl1-mesa-dri suggests:
pn  libglide3                     <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information



Reply to: