[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#488050: marked as done (no package should depend on xutils anymore)



Your message dated Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:53:54 +0200
with message-id <4862B062.1020408@ens-lyon.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#488050: no package should depend on xutils anymore
has caused the Debian Bug report #488050,
regarding no package should depend on xutils anymore
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
488050: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488050
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xutils
Version: 1:7.3+11
Severity: wishlist

Dilemma:
# apt-get dist-upgrade
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  xutils-dev
The following packages will be upgraded:
  xutils

But I don't want xutils-dev. I don't use them.

# apt-get purge xutils
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  gsfonts-x11* t1-cyrillic* ttf-arhangai* ttf-arphic-bkai00mp* ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp* ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp*
  ttf-arphic-gkai00mp* xpdf-chinese-simplified* xpdf-chinese-traditional* xutils*
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 10 to remove and 21 not upgraded.
After this operation, 42.9MB disk space will be freed.

But I do want these.

So apparently the only choice is to file bugs on all the packages
depending on xutils, telling them to please depend on what part of the
now split up xutils they really need.

Perhaps the xutils maintainer would be a better person to file these
bugs, as he knows what the real issues are.

No package should depend on xutils anymore, even if they really need
all its components, I suppose.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: xutils
> Version: 1:7.3+11
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dilemma:
> # apt-get dist-upgrade
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   xutils-dev
> The following packages will be upgraded:
>   xutils
>
> But I don't want xutils-dev. I don't use them.
>
> # apt-get purge xutils
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>   gsfonts-x11* t1-cyrillic* ttf-arhangai* ttf-arphic-bkai00mp* ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp* ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp*
>   ttf-arphic-gkai00mp* xpdf-chinese-simplified* xpdf-chinese-traditional* xutils*
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 10 to remove and 21 not upgraded.
> After this operation, 42.9MB disk space will be freed.
>
> But I do want these.
>
> So apparently the only choice is to file bugs on all the packages
> depending on xutils, telling them to please depend on what part of the
> now split up xutils they really need.
>
> Perhaps the xutils maintainer would be a better person to file these
> bugs, as he knows what the real issues are.
>
> No package should depend on xutils anymore, even if they really need
> all its components, I suppose.
>   

We're already taking care of this. Please read the existing bugs and the
changelog instead of opening a new bug for everything.

Brice



--- End Message ---

Reply to: