Bug#486891: xorg: setxkbmap fails to properly set romanian std mapping
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.3+10
Severity: normal
"setxkbmap -model pc104 -layout ro -variant std" does not bring the wanted
Romanian std layout, but the std_cedilla
one. Playing with the config file it seems that std_cedilla is some kind of
fallback, as if I delete all other
mappings Ro std will not set, instead will get the annoying most generic
error: "Error loading new keyboard
description". Romanian basic, which has the same ş and ţ symbols works.
I did not come to solution yet by playing with the file. Please have some sort
of regression testing for this, as
every once in a while Debian Testing breaks the Romanian keyboard.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages xorg depends on:
ii konsole [x-terminal- 4:3.5.9.dfsg.1-2+b1 X terminal emulator for KDE
ii libgl1-mesa-glx [lib 7.0.3-1 A free implementation of the
OpenG
ii libglu1-mesa 7.0.3-1 The OpenGL utility library (GLU)
ii x11-apps 7.3+1 X applications
ii x11-session-utils 7.3+1 X session utilities
ii x11-utils 7.3+2 X11 utilities
ii x11-xfs-utils 7.3+1 X font server utilities
ii x11-xkb-utils 7.4+1 X11 XKB utilities
ii x11-xserver-utils 7.3+3 X server utilities
ii xauth 1:1.0.3-1 X authentication utility
ii xfonts-100dpi 1:1.0.0-4 100 dpi fonts for X
ii xfonts-75dpi 1:1.0.0-4 75 dpi fonts for X
ii xfonts-base 1:1.0.0-5 standard fonts for X
ii xfonts-scalable 1:1.0.0-6 scalable fonts for X
ii xfonts-utils 1:7.4+1 X Window System font utility
progr
ii xinit 1.0.9-2 X server initialisation tool
ii xkb-data 1.3-1 X Keyboard Extension (XKB)
configu
ii xserver-xorg 1:7.3+10 the X.Org X server
Versions of packages xorg recommends:
ii xorg-docs 1:1.4-2 Miscellaneous documentation for
th
-- no debconf information
--
alecs
Reply to: