[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

xserver-xorg-input-dynapro: Changes to 'refs/tags/xserver-xorg-input-dynapro-1_1.1.2-1'



Tag 'xserver-xorg-input-dynapro-1_1.1.2-1' created by Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> at 2008-05-22 17:30 +0000

Tagging upload of xserver-xorg-input-dynapro 1:1.1.2-1 to unstable.

Changes since xserver-xorg-input-dynapro-1_1.1.1-2:
Adam Jackson (1):
      dynapro 1.1.2

David Nusinow (2):
      Remove make-orig-tar-gz target
      Kill the manifest code.

Julien Cristau (11):
      xsfbs.mk: make 'serverabi' depend on 'install'
      Merge git.debian.org:/git/pkg-xorg/xsfbs into debian-experimental
      Merge tag 'xf86-input-dynapro-1.1.2' into debian-experimental
      autoreconf
      Update changelogs
      Build against xserver 1.5 rc1 and minor debian/control updates
      Remove xsfbs-autoreconf.mk
      Merge git.debian.org:/git/pkg-xorg/xsfbs into debian-unstable
      Build against xserver 1.4
      Run dpkg-shlibdeps with --warnings=6.
      Prepare changelog for upload

Paulo Cesar Pereira de Andrade (1):
      Don't call xf86XInputSetSendCoreEvents

---
 ChangeLog                        |   14 
 Makefile.in                      |   29 -
 aclocal.m4                       |  265 ++++++++-----
 config.guess                     |   32 +
 config.sub                       |   44 +-
 configure                        |  770 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 configure.ac                     |    2 
 debian/changelog                 |   12 
 debian/control                   |    8 
 debian/rules                     |    2 
 debian/xsfbs/xsfbs-autoreconf.mk |  150 -------
 debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk            |   80 ----
 depcomp                          |   33 -
 install-sh                       |  228 ++++++-----
 ltmain.sh                        |   58 ++
 man/Makefile.in                  |    6 
 src/Makefile.in                  |   29 -
 src/xf86Dyna.c                   |    4 
 18 files changed, 1063 insertions(+), 703 deletions(-)
---


Reply to: