[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#482150: compiz-plugins must depends kde stuff?

Package: compiz-plugins
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: minor

In attempt to upgrade compiz-plugins to 0.7.4-1, compiz-plugins 
force me to install kwin and kdelibs4c2a. This is ok?? I don't want 
like the idea of install kde stuff in my debian GNOME box to run compiz!
        Thanks in advance.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages compiz-plugins depends on:
ii  compiz-core 0.6.3~git20080115.0ea58487-1 OpenGL window and compositing mana
ii  gconf2      2.22.0-1                     GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libc6       2.7-11                       GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2   1.6.4-2                      The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libdbus-1-3 1.2.1-2                      simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libdecorati 0.7.4-1                      Compiz window decoration library
ii  libgconf2-4 2.22.0-1                     GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglib2.0- 2.16.3-2                     The GLib library of C routines
ii  libglu1-mes 7.0.3-1                      The OpenGL utility library (GLU)
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.12.9-4                     The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  liborbit2   1:2.14.12-0.1                libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpng12-0  1.2.27-1                     PNG library - runtime
ii  librsvg2-2  2.22.2-2                     SAX-based renderer library for SVG
ii  libx11-6    2:1.0.3-7                    X11 client-side library
ii  libxml2     2.6.32.dfsg-2                GNOME XML library
ii  libxrender1 1:0.9.4-1                    X Rendering Extension client libra

compiz-plugins recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

Reply to: