Bug#477550: Bug#477547: please remove this transitional package
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 21:33:16 +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> > package: xlibs-data
> > version: 1:7.3+10
> > Usertags: etch-transitional-packages
> >
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 21:34:04 +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> > package: xlibs-static-dev
> > version: 1:7.3+10
> > Usertags: etch-transitional-packages
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this binary package seems to be a transitional package used to upgrade
> > from sarge to etch, that can now be safely removed.
> > If that is so, please fix the source package not to produce this
> > binary package anymore.
>
> Unfortunately there are still packages (build-)depending on those.
> I filed bugs a while ago, you're welcome to fix them. In the mean time,
> no, they can't be "safely" removed from the archive.
Thanks for the reply. I made a mistake then, I only did:
$ apt-cache rdepends xlibs-data
xlibs-data
Reverse Depends:
xkb-data-legacy
xkb-data-legacy
xcursor-themes
xcursor-themes
xbitmaps
xbitmaps
libx11-6
$ apt-cache rdepends xlibs-static-dev
xlibs-static-dev
Reverse Depends:
x11proto-xf86vidmode-dev
x11proto-xf86vidmode-dev
x11proto-xf86misc-dev
x11proto-xf86misc-dev
x11proto-xf86dga-dev
x11proto-xf86dga-dev
x11proto-xf86bigfont-dev
x11proto-xf86bigfont-dev
x11proto-bigreqs-dev
x11proto-bigreqs-dev
libxfont-dev
But all those packages only conflict or replace xlibs-data or
xlibs-static-dev. So now I did:
$ grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends -s Package "xlibs-data"
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.cz.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_source_Sources
Package: enlightenment
Package: pixmap
Package: xtel
$ grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends -s Package "xlibs-static-dev"
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.cz.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_source_Sources
Package: enlightenment
Package: gem
Package: gl-117
Package: gvidm
Package: wine
For example for enlightement, you reported this a year ago already:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419023
with no response at all.
Ok, let's leave this bug open until the above packages are fixed and
then remove it from archive.
Ondrej
Reply to: