[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#459041: xterm: version 230-1 segfaults somewhere when involving cut and paste



Package: xterm
Version: 230-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss

Cutting text somewhere in an xterm causes it to segfault with the most
recent upgrade.  It may involve either the cut or paste of long lines.
I'm pretty sure it happens as soon as I click the mouse to make a
selection, and can happen after a successful cut and paste or two.

I haven't yet restarted X, but that's not going to cause a dynamic
library inconsistency problem.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.23 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii  libc6                     2.7-5          GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libfontconfig1            2.5.0-2        generic font configuration library
ii  libice6                   2:1.0.4-1      X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5               5.6+20071215-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsm6                    2:1.0.3-1+b1   X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6                  2:1.0.3-7      X11 client-side library
ii  libxaw7                   2:1.0.4-1      X11 Athena Widget library
ii  libxext6                  1:1.0.3-2      X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxft2                   2.1.12-2       FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxmu6                   1:1.0.3-1      X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxt6                    1:1.0.5-3      X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  xbitmaps                  1.0.1-2        Base X bitmaps

Versions of packages xterm recommends:
ii  xutils                        1:7.3+9    X Window System utility programs m

-- no debconf information



Reply to: