[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#404885: xserver-xorg-video-vesa VERY SLOW




On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Brice Goglin wrote:

Hi Robert,

A couple months ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding the
X server being very slow with the vesa driver. Does this problem still
happen today? There has not been many changes upstream in the vesa

For stable and testing ...
xserver-xorg: 1:7.1.0-18
xserver-xorg-video-vesa: 1:1.3.0-1
Kernel: Linux version 2.6.18-4-686 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12) (waldi@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)) #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 17:17:36 UTC 2007

--> xorg
" (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE OEM Vendor: TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS INC.
" (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE OEM Product: CYBER 2100
" (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE OEM Product Rev: RXT  7.3 (16.28)
" (II) VESA(0): virtual address = 0xb7b3b000,
"         physical address = 0xa0000, size = 65536
" (==) VESA(0): Default visual is TrueColor
" (==) VESA(0): Backing store disabled

--> mplayer
" VO: [x11] 480x352 => 480x352 Planar YV12  [zoom]
" SwScaler: using unscaled yuv420p -> rgb32 special converter

--> top
"   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
"  3095 root       5 -10 30044  22m 6064 S 46.9  4.4   1:13.40 Xorg
"  4166 robert    15   0 50444  22m  15m S  2.7  4.4   0:05.50 mplayer

The problem still exists in "testing".

For unstable ...

" The following packages will be REMOVED
"   tzdata util-linux util-linux-locales
" The following packages will be upgraded:
"   libc6 libc6-dev libdrm-dev libdrm2 locales xserver-xorg xserver-xorg-core
" WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
" This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
"   util-linux tzdata (due to util-linux)

so I really don't want to try to upgrade to unstable right now :-)

Still I _think_ the problem is in the vesa driver itself which is the
same version across all of stable, testing and unstable.

However, I will try again next week.

--
Rob.                          (Robert de Bath <robert$ @ debath.co.uk>)
                                             <http://www.debath.co.uk/>




Reply to: