[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#403640: marked as done (compiz doesn't start automatically)



Your message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:05:19 +0200
with message-id <46251A6F.8060801@ens-lyon.org>
and subject line Bug#403640: compiz doesn't start automatically
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: compiz
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: normal

Hello!

I'm happy to see compiz in testing... However, it seems that it
doesn't *want* to start by itself. Some time ago, I ran compiz
--replace which worked fine. The next time i started my session (and
all the sessions I'm seeing now), i need to start compiz by hand (by
typing "compiz", in a shell).

What am I missing?

A.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages compiz depends on:
ii  compiz-core                   0.2.2-1    OpenGL window and compositing mana
ii  compiz-gnome                  0.2.2-1    OpenGL window and compositing mana
ii  compiz-gtk                    0.2.2-1    OpenGL window and compositing mana
ii  compiz-plugins                0.2.2-1    OpenGL window and compositing mana

compiz recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Earlier comments should explain well to how to get compiz to start
automatically, closing.

Brice


--- End Message ---

Reply to: