* Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 23:02 -0500, David Nusinow wrote: [...] > AFAICS the beryl repositories don't have merge commits from upstream > repos though, so one still has to figure out which upstream branch(es) > the upstream bits came from, and there's no upstream history. Is that > intended? If so, IMO that would diminish the value of the upstream-* > branches considerably. That would be due to the fact that the beryl project currently doesn't use git but SVN. AIUI those repositories were created from upstream tarballs. Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature