hey emilio, On Sunday 16 December 2007 06:22:57 pm emisca wrote: > Do you have considered inclusion of the compiz-manager > (http://releases.compiz-fusion.org/0.6.0/compiz-manager-0.6.0.tar.gz) > in the compiz package, or as a new separate package? i guess we were thinking the same thing... because about 1 minute before you sent this email i had uploaded a new compiz package which, among other things, include compiz-manager as a replacement for the previous compiz.wrapper :) This closes a *lot* of the open bugs against compiz, which were the result of the old wrapper doing things like always loading the gconf plugin instead of the ccp plugin (which breaks a lot of things), and always executing the gtk decorator (which breaks even more). you should see some traffic on this list shortly about the closed bugs, i imagine... about compiz-manager: it's hosted in a seperate git repository on the compiz-fusion site, but since it's a single shell script i don't really see much argument for hosting it as a seperate source package (i think there are too many already, to be honest). i'll just make sure there's something in place to keep it in sync with upstream. thanks for chiming in with your opinion on the matter, it's good to know i wasn't the only one thinking that! sean
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.