Bug#448961: mesa-utils: full backtrace included
Package: mesa-utils
Version: 6.3.2-2.1
Followup-For: Bug #448961
glxinfo-crash1.txt: 'bt full' from gdb.
Script started on Thu 01 Nov 2007 04:02:32 PM MDT
supaplex@armada:~$ gdb glxinfo
GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu"...(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/glxinfo
Failed to read a valid object file image from memory.
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
name of display: :0.0
Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual
visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav
id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb7d57dee in strstr () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt full
#0 0xb7d57dee in strstr () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x08049a75 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#2 0x0804b1d0 in _IO_stdin_used ()
No symbol table info available.
#3 0x00000000 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
(gdb) The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) y
supaplex@armada:~$
Script done on Thu 01 Nov 2007 04:02:49 PM MDT
Reply to: