Bug#445067: upgrade breaks EDID probing with Intel 945GM chipset
forcemerge 437066 445067
thank you
James R. Van Zandt wrote:
> Here's the revised report. I see the EDID information does appear now, so
> your diagnosis looks right.
>
> [...]
>
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1024x768" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1024x768" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1152x864" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1280x960" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1280x1024" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1600x1200" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1792x1344" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1856x1392" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1920x1440" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "832x624" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1280x768" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1280x800" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1152x768" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1152x864" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1400x1050" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1440x900" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1600x1024" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1680x1050" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1920x1200" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1920x1440" (exceeds panel dimensions)
> (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "2048x1536" (exceeds panel dimensions)
>
Since 832x624 exceeds panel dimensions while 800x600 is ok, I guess it
wrongly detected PanelSize 800x600.
Actually I wrong about the similar bug report, it's #437066. So I
merging with this one and I added a note in the corresponding upstream
bug at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11932
Brice
Reply to: