[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#438997: marked as done (advertises Xserver version instead of Xorg version)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:14:42 +0200
with message-id <46EF6CD2.6030304@ens-lyon.org>
and subject line Bug#438997: xorg: incorrect version number in log
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.3~rc1
Severity: minor


Hi,

a diff just after un upgrade from experimental shows an incoherent
version number between version (one of them is probably wrong).
Apparently on refers to the server, the other to the Xorg distribution:

-X Window System Version 1.3.0
-Release Date: 19 April 2007
-X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 1.3
-Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12)
+X Window System Version 7.2.0
+Release Date: 21 December 2005
+X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.2
+Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.3.99.0-2)

HTH,
	Xav

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8@euro (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xorg depends on:
ii  gnome-terminal [x-ter 2.18.1-1           The GNOME 2 terminal emulator appl
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libg 7.0.1-1            A free implementation of the OpenG
ii  libglu1-mesa          7.0.1-1            The OpenGL utility library (GLU)
ii  type-handling [not+sp 0.2.21             dpkg architecture generation scrip
ii  xbase-clients         1:7.3~rc1          miscellaneous X clients - metapack
ii  xfonts-100dpi         1:1.0.0-4          100 dpi fonts for X
ii  xfonts-75dpi          1:1.0.0-4          75 dpi fonts for X
ii  xfonts-base           1:1.0.0-5          standard fonts for X
ii  xfonts-scalable       1:1.0.0-6          scalable fonts for X
ii  xkb-data              1.0~cvs.20070721-1 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  xserver-xorg          1:7.3~rc1          the X.Org X server
ii  xterm [x-terminal-emu 229-1              X terminal emulator
ii  xutils                1:7.3~rc1          X Window System utility programs m

Versions of packages xorg recommends:
ii  xorg-docs                     1:1.4-2    Miscellaneous documentation for th

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
found 438997 2:1.3.99.0-1
notfound 438997 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-12
fixed 438997 2:1.4-1
thank you



Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On mar, 2007-08-21 at 21:09 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
>> It seems to be expected (I mean "not broken by the Debian packaging").
>> The Xserver master branch has been containing the Xorg version number
>> for a while (still 7.2 as of today then), while server-1.3-branch
>> switched to the Xserver version numbers a little bit after being forked.
>> http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/xserver.git;a=commitdiff;h=cb86fced0e379badd96af5ad303710af30fafd2e;hp=e707604ab3fd45c1f9d07b666181fc181e68a827
>
> Ah, ok. So 1.3.99 isn't from the server-1.3-branch.
> Maybe I'll have a look at it.

As expected, xserver-xorg-core 1.4 advertises:
    X.Org X Server 1.4.0
    Release Date: 5 September 2007
It looks good to me. Only the release candidates 1.3.99.x in
experimental were strangely numbered.

Brice

--- End Message ---
Reply to: