[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#191597: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [debconf] write defoma font paths to generated XF86Config files)



Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:53:54 +0200
with message-id <20070725055353.GA1039@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Bug#191597: xserver-xfree86: dexconf should generate XF86Config-4 with defoma FontPath entries
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Recent versions of xfree86 support TrueType fonts well.  Debian also has a
nice mechanism for managing these fonts.  The default XF86Config-4 file
produced by dexconf, however, does not allow these fonts to be used.
The attached patch fixes this.  If defoma has not been installed, I don't
believe that there is any problem, since X will ingore the missing
directories.

It might also be a good idea to make xserver-xfree86 suggest defoma, so
that everyone gets to enjoy the wonders of TrueType, right out of the box.

While we're at it, the defoma directories should probably be added to
the default xfs configuration.

						Neil


--- dexconf.orig	2003-05-01 17:52:23.000000000 -0700
+++ dexconf	2003-05-01 17:52:10.000000000 -0700
@@ -217,8 +217,9 @@
 Section "Files"
 	FontPath	"unix/:7100"			# local font server
 	# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
+	FontPath        "/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/CID"
+	FontPath        "/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType"
 	FontPath	"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
-	FontPath	"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID"
 	FontPath	"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo"
 	FontPath	"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc"
 	FontPath	"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic"



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, May  1, 2003 at 18:45:13 -0700, Neil A. Rubin wrote:

> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-6
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> 
> Recent versions of xfree86 support TrueType fonts well.  Debian also has a
> nice mechanism for managing these fonts.  The default XF86Config-4 file
> produced by dexconf, however, does not allow these fonts to be used.
> The attached patch fixes this.  If defoma has not been installed, I don't
> believe that there is any problem, since X will ingore the missing
> directories.
> 
> It might also be a good idea to make xserver-xfree86 suggest defoma, so
> that everyone gets to enjoy the wonders of TrueType, right out of the box.
> 
> While we're at it, the defoma directories should probably be added to
> the default xfs configuration.
> 
Recent versions of dexconf don't write a Files section in the generated
xorg.conf, and the default font path built in the X server includes
/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType.
I'm thus closing this bug.

Cheers,
Julien

> 						Neil
> 
> 
> --- dexconf.orig	2003-05-01 17:52:23.000000000 -0700
> +++ dexconf	2003-05-01 17:52:10.000000000 -0700
> @@ -217,8 +217,9 @@
>  Section "Files"
>  	FontPath	"unix/:7100"			# local font server
>  	# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
> +	FontPath        "/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/CID"
> +	FontPath        "/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType"
>  	FontPath	"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
> -	FontPath	"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID"
>  	FontPath	"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo"
>  	FontPath	"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc"
>  	FontPath	"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic"
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Julien Cristau <jcristau@liafa.jussieu.fr>
PhD Student                  LIAFA - Universite Paris 7
http://liafa.jussieu.fr/~jcristau/

--- End Message ---

Reply to: